From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 28 03:07:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA10503 for current-outgoing; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 03:07:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (wck-ca22-16.ix.netcom.com [207.92.174.144]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA10498 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 03:07:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id DAA05722; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 03:07:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 03:07:12 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199801281107.DAA05722@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: hoek@hwcn.org CC: tlambert@primenet.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Tim Vanderhoek on Wed, 28 Jan 1998 01:37:57 -0500 (EST)) Subject: Re: PATCH: if_de.c #ifdef based version encoding From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk * I in no way advocate this, but it is technically possible to Cc: * original copies of the pr to -hackers or -current... Nevermind * that most -hackers (and -currenters) who -hack read the -bugs * list, -anyways... Actually, this could cause problems when someone who read the original submission on -hackers or -current is inclined to reply. Many mail programs will attach a "CC: freebsd-gnats-submit@...", and voila, a new PR for every mail message. :> Satoshi