From owner-cvs-lkm  Mon Feb  9 11:45:55 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-lkm>
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA09725
          for cvs-lkm-outgoing; Mon, 9 Feb 1998 11:45:55 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-lkm)
Received: from gvr.gvr.org (root@gvr.gvr.org [194.151.74.97])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA09444;
          Mon, 9 Feb 1998 11:45:13 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from guido@gvr.org)
Received: (from guido@localhost)
	by gvr.gvr.org (8.8.6/8.8.5) id UAA15995;
	Mon, 9 Feb 1998 20:44:13 +0100 (MET)
From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>
Message-Id: <199802091944.UAA15995@gvr.gvr.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lkm/cd9660 Makefile src/lkm/ibcs2 Makefile         src/lkm/linux Makefile src/lkm/msdos Makefile src/lkm/nfs
In-Reply-To: <199802091936.LAA13858@burka.rdy.com> from Dima Ruban at "Feb 9, 98 11:36:56 am"
To: dima@best.net
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 20:44:12 +0100 (MET)
Cc: dima@best.net, eivind@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG,
        cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-lkm@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cvs-lkm@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Dima Ruban wrote:
> Guido van Rooij writes:
> > Dima Ruban wrote:
> > > Just an idea.
> > > I think, we should have something like NO_LKM option or something.
> > > Sometimes it's usefull.
> > > (Yes, I know that I can define MAXLKMS to 0, or whatever it's name)
> > 
> > Yes!!
> 
> Yes what? yes I can define MAXLKMS or yes we should introduce a new option? :-)

An option NO_LKM ;-)

-Guido