Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 14:05:46 -0700 From: Douglas Thrift <douglaswth@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Naming convention for etc/periodic/*/* files? Message-ID: <2c02c995-bbc3-3342-f30d-ade2c550c629@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <slrnojgnt8.2e9s.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> References: <slrnojgnt8.2e9s.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/7/2017 1:18 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > What is the naming convention for etc/periodic/*/* files installed > by ports? > > Looking over the ports tree, I see that most adhere to the > NNN.*name* pattern also used in the base system, although it's > unclear how the NNN numbers are assigned and the rest of the name > is somewhat flexible. > > The lone exception is sysutils/smartmontools, which installs > etc/periodic/daily/smart. > Just another data point, on my system there are two others: /usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/dmidecode was installed by package sysutils/dmidecode /usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/sa-utils was installed by package mail/sa-utils -- Douglas William Thrift <http://douglasthrift.net/>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2c02c995-bbc3-3342-f30d-ade2c550c629>