From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 7 6:38:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72B037B405; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 06:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g57Da8Bh012858; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:36:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: j mckitrick Cc: Mike Silbersack , John Baldwin , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SMP/5.0 performance on single CPU? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Jun 2002 14:12:10 BST." <20020607141209.A84104@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 15:36:08 +0200 Message-ID: <12857.1023456968@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20020607141209.A84104@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>, j mckitrick writes: >On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:44:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >| In message <20020607125004.A83543@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>, j mckitrick writes: >| >| On the other hand, there are numerous new features (GEOM, TrustedBSD, >| >| OpenPAM, Snapshots + background fsck, etc) being implemented in 5.x that >| > >| >| >Other than devfs (which I haven't investigated yet) it seems most of >| >these features are extras, not the basics, correct? Other than SMP, of >| >course. >| >| It is the intent that GEOM will be standard (or basics if you like). > >But this will be one of those transparent features, correct? Hopefully. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message