Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:42:34 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: "Thomas Mueller" <mueller230@insightbb.com> Cc: Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org>, Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>, David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang? Message-ID: <20448.26026.963013.57533@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <14.FA.06229.7A140EF4@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> References: <14.FA.06229.7A140EF4@smtp01.insight.synacor.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Mueller writes: > Now how will I know whether GCC or Clang is the default compiler > for building the world and kernel, and for ports? My understanding is: 8.* base - gcc ports - gcc 9.0 (and possibly 9.*) base - gcc ports - clang (with the caveat some ports need either any gcc or a specific version) CURRENT base - as of this writing, clang (look for announcement in current@ or hackers@) ports - clang, as above though with a shorter list (Someone please correct me if they have more accurate information.) Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20448.26026.963013.57533>