From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Mon Mar 27 12:30:03 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8502DD20BDE; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citapm.icyb.net.ua (citapm.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB12784; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citapm.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id PAA13776; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:30:00 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1csTma-000Gdi-7T; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:30:00 +0300 Subject: Re: svn commit: r315959 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 amd64/vmm amd64/vmm/amd i386/i386 x86/include x86/x86 x86/xen To: Chagin Dmitry References: <201703251845.v2PIj9k2029497@repo.freebsd.org> <20170326083021.GA1899@mordor.heemeyer.club> <1349a6c5-0fe3-b873-f372-4ec9046fa71f@FreeBSD.org> <20170327110523.GA10879@mordor.heemeyer.club> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org From: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:28:59 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170327110523.GA10879@mordor.heemeyer.club> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:30:03 -0000 On 27/03/2017 14:05, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > I believe it, but on my machine genassym.c is processed before device_if.m Yeah, looks like the order could be arbitrary because the dependency is not defined. Anyway, I am reverting the change. Thank you for the report and sorry for the trouble. -- Andriy Gapon