From owner-freebsd-ports Mon May 22 13: 0:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hyperhost.net (hyperhost.net [207.159.132.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E8C37BC31 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 13:00:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from patseal@hyperhost.net) Received: from foobar.foobar.eyep.net (postfix@p4.a8.du.radix.net [207.192.132.132]) by hyperhost.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA29348 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 16:00:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by foobar.foobar.eyep.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7DC601380DB; Mon, 22 May 2000 15:57:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:57:59 -0400 From: Patrick Seal To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: re: ports/18170 prestimel Message-ID: <20000522155759.A92949@hyperhost.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD foobar.foobar.eyep.net 4.0-STABLE FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE Organization: Hyperhost Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org It seems whenever a port doesn't get committed within a month or two a discussion come up whether the submitter should send a polite note and after how long. It seems that I've read that the consensus has been a month. Here's my polite note for ports/18170 prestimel Creates presentations from a simple textfile with HTML output -- ------------------------------------ _____________________________________ Patrick Seal |"Microsoft isn't evil, they just make | really crappy operating systems." Hyperhost - http://www.hyperhost.net| -Linus Torvalds To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message