Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:01:27 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: All Berkeley db's downloads broken Message-ID: <B7E356388F93B9BB5FCFC69E@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <m3zmabs1ao.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <9346780FF79C46C73668FD49@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <m3zmabs1ao.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==========1C43B7AD0127E085F46E========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Tuesday, November 28, 2006 22:34:39 +0100 Matthias Andree=20 <matthias.andree@gmx.de> wrote: > Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> writes: > >> Apparently Oracle has changed the location of berkeley dbs, eliminating >> the need for DIST_SUBDIR=3D bdb. Furthermore, the checksums appear = to >> have changed for the main tarballs. > > > DIST_SUBDIR has nothing to do with the upstream download location, but > determines where the files are put locally when they are being > downloaded (and obviously, where the ports system will try to extract > the tarballs and read the patches from). > Groan - I knew that. Don't know what I was thinking there.... But the checksums had changed, right? Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========1C43B7AD0127E085F46E==========--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B7E356388F93B9BB5FCFC69E>