From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 28 22:04:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862AB16A4D8 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:04:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078D743CAC for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:04:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C62388D1C; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:04:55 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:01:27 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: Matthias Andree Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <9346780FF79C46C73668FD49@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========1C43B7AD0127E085F46E==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: All Berkeley db's downloads broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:04:58 -0000 --==========1C43B7AD0127E085F46E========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Tuesday, November 28, 2006 22:34:39 +0100 Matthias Andree=20 wrote: > Paul Schmehl writes: > >> Apparently Oracle has changed the location of berkeley dbs, eliminating >> the need for DIST_SUBDIR=3D bdb. Furthermore, the checksums appear = to >> have changed for the main tarballs. > > > DIST_SUBDIR has nothing to do with the upstream download location, but > determines where the files are put locally when they are being > downloaded (and obviously, where the ports system will try to extract > the tarballs and read the patches from). > Groan - I knew that. Don't know what I was thinking there.... But the checksums had changed, right? Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========1C43B7AD0127E085F46E==========--