Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:24:58 +0200 From: Emanuel Strobl <emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: =?utf-8?b?0JzQsNGAJ9GP0L0g0J/QtdGC0YDQuNGI0LjQvQ==?= <maryanp@ukr.net> Subject: Re: "multyple gateway" or "load balancing" on two channels Message-ID: <200504021025.07132@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <424E491D.4040005@ukr.net> References: <424E491D.4040005@ukr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart22267458.nYdNhLddKC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Samstag, 2. April 2005 09:26 schrieb =D0=9C=D0=B0=D1=80'=D1=8F=D0=BD =D0= =9F=D0=B5=D1=82=D1=80=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B8=D0=BD: > Hello. > > How I use "subject" without help of providers side (wthout BGP, pptp etc.= ). You can use pf for multihomed routers, if you just want to use multiple lin= es=20 for downloads. If you want to provide Webservices or anything similar with= =20 more than one line for redundancy/load balancing you have to BGP peer with= =20 your providers. But like said, if you just want to use multiple lines for connections from= =20 inside to the inet, look for rules like: pass in on $LAN route-to ($IF1 IP1) from $1stsubnet to any pass in on $LAN route-to ($IF2 IP2) from $2ndsubnet to any =2DHarry > > Thanks. > Mar'yan Petryshyn. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart22267458.nYdNhLddKC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCTlbjBylq0S4AzzwRAjC/AKCI1d+VavOyIZWxSMTSKmFZrkQhtwCcDOgD FR0dNpUK4GN2AQia7sug1WY= =97Nj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart22267458.nYdNhLddKC--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200504021025.07132>