From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 08:09:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E6E16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:09:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F6743D2F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:09:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5S89fr5035869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:09:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.11/8.12.5/Submit) id i5S89fLw035868 for current@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:09:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:09:41 +0200 From: Divacky Roman To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040628080941.GA35739@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20040627145408.GA71410@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20040627170243.GA61973@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040627170243.GA61973@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Subject: Re: Suggest to upgrade some software in base X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:09:49 -0000 On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 10:02:43AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 04:54:08PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I digged through our base system and looked for versions of contributed > > soft. I found these program which could (and I think should) be easily > > and painlessly upgraded (before 5.3 as 5-STABLE) because they are > > outdated etc... these are: > > > > file - 3.41 -> 4.09 > > Painless upgrade and the benefit is much newer magic file > > ftp://ftp.astron.com/pub/file/ > > Only semi-painless. The code and how it is built has changed around a > lot, else I would have upgraded it by now. That said, in progress; but > lower priority than my toolchain work. > > And why does this have to happen before 5-STABLE? I can certainly MFC > something like this. of course it doesnt HAVE to be upgraded but I think it should be... anyway - that was what I saw and considered good candidates for upgrading its up to you to do whats needed ;) I would also like to raise that tcsh upgrade - that is CERTAINLY painless since its only about some 36 bugs repaired and nothing more... roman