From owner-svn-doc-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 4 15:29:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA5285F7; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7796218B8; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s14FTjgW037560; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 08:29:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s14FTj0J037557; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 08:29:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 08:29:45 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Gabor Kovesdan Subject: Re: svn commit: r43755 - head/share/misc In-Reply-To: <201402041447.s14El2tu005083@svn.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201402041447.s14El2tu005083@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 04 Feb 2014 08:29:45 -0700 (MST) Cc: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the doc tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:29:46 -0000 On Tue, 4 Feb 2014, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Author: gabor > Date: Tue Feb 4 14:47:02 2014 > New Revision: 43755 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/43755 > > Log: > - Revert the change of the size of admonition boxes since it did not render > fine when embedded to procedures Thank you! > (should that be allowed at all?) Yes. Steps of the procedure may need individual admonitions like "warning: this step will erase the disk" or "tip: sometimes a bigger hammer really does help."