Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:08:39 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Frederic Culot <culot@FreeBSD.org>, Eric <freebsdports@chillibear.com>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/rubygem-mail Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20110726010838.GA936@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <4E2DF92D.9020601@FreeBSD.org> References: <201107251146.p6PBkSLU027484@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E2DF92D.9020601@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 16:15:57 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Silently using activesupport if it is installed already is exactly > what you should not do. The change to remove the dependency should be > backed out. >From the upstream changelog: "Remove ActiveSupport from the dependencies, load Active Support if present, or use internals if not" Would it be more appropriate to have an option that pulls in the activesupport depedency if it is desired by the user? -- Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110726010838.GA936>