From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 26 04:12:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF06106566B for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 04:12:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from superbisquit@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4808FC13 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 04:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so277136vws.13 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:12:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=GuALse9wlwG8zLgI5MJjLlpxJ7ycVhFHbTJmaXPD2cc=; b=tq748rKDGLwKH5WZLU1ZplZ4CVb5mKxJwi0vXQH2/DuRPK5KVEjuGUlkG5ELdQOiAc wJCxyH+d33jI9T3vHkn3A/drgv69eFpavgNNCe3GlwF0zG9HEOaKbebdos3En0lbidKq hkPDlmn6t6y68MbvZNMyE8Hlw/Z0gB3Rl7bqw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=edy01bZwH/Ggbjxi8GdC4z6Gr+TpP2Mtk/Eqf3Nq5i/4Bf6Mg30tWTVDqVOPQdFGtE qb8CsEobkP2c2kA+zF5MOGkJbUZpqK5xCSGWbjVEK7ept1TZNewtp/YYYo80UnGXNHCD f9BsEgt5/oj7TXMwdtecPfLmykDh8csMTi4eg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.193.141 with SMTP id du13mr81262vcb.98.1303791140644; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.199.2 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:12:20 -0400 Message-ID: From: Super Bisquit To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 04:13:26 +0000 Subject: -mvis, Will it improve performance. X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 04:12:21 -0000 Wonder if there is an advantage to the flag or not.