Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 08:50:28 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com> To: michaelh@cet.co.jp, ponds!ponds!rivers Cc: ponds!FreeBSD.ORG!Hackers Subject: Re: Even more info on daily panics... Message-ID: <199611131350.IAA17637@lakes.water.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > IMHO, it's not good to speculate. You need to confirm with absolute > certainty that the patch is what actually fixed it. > > You might want to do either of the following: > > 1) Remove the patch and see if what happens. > > 2) Put in print statements and see if the relevent section of code ever > gets executed. See other #ifdef DIAGNOSTICS for examples of how to do > this. I think vrele() had one. > > > Regards, > > > Mike Hancock Yes! What an excellent idea! It simply never occurred to me (dooh.) I'll put a printf() in the vfs_subr.c source - so that if we would have walked off the end of the chain (or back around), we'll get something. The other vrele() diagnostic hasn't been tripped; so we must not be getting a negative usecount... - Dave Rivers -
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611131350.IAA17637>