Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:26:18 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wish List (was: Re: The /usr/bin/games bikeshed again) Message-ID: <20010216102618.A90210@hamlet.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <200102161431.f1GEVCX28090@cwsys.cwsent.com>; from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca on Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 06:30:27AM -0800 References: <200102160607.f1G67k944464@gratis.grondar.za> <200102161431.f1GEVCX28090@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 06:30:27AM -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > Other candidates, Kerveros IV. Anyone is serious about using Kerberos > would install the krb5 port. (I don't consider heimdal a serious > condender, it's already a port and it should have stayed there). IMO, > both Kerberos IV and heimdal are just a waste of disk space). Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on your comments about Heimdal. There is a lot to like about it over the MIT Kerberos implementation, not the least of which is the fact that the MIT Kerberos license still does not allow export from US. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010216102618.A90210>