From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon Jan 26 06:30:24 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA26907
          for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 06:30:24 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA26901
          for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 1998 06:30:19 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA31752;
	Tue, 27 Jan 1998 01:29:38 +1100
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 01:29:38 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199801261429.BAA31752@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org, sprice@hiwaay.net
Subject: Re: misc/1376
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> Bill Fenner wrote:
> >
> > I don't think this is appropriate; as Gary said, the correct thing is
> > probably to bzero the if_data struct (e.g. why should ibytes get set to
> > zero but not imcasts, or iqdrops?).

> This is why I just applied it to -current. :)  Would the attached
> patch make everyone happier?  If not, your patches are always welcome.

The bzero seems to be a no-op, since tunattach() is only called once and
tunctl[] is statically initialized to 0.

Bruce