From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 2 08:43:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AC616A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 08:43:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4865143D41 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 08:43:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a236.otenet.gr [212.205.215.236]) j328gr4l016663; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:42:56 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j328MDwN001555; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:22:13 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j328MA7P001554; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:22:10 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:22:10 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Gert Cuykens Message-ID: <20050402082210.GC840@gothmog.gr> References: <20050401012107.GA57109@gothmog.gr> <20050401014254.GA60499@gothmog.gr> <20050401095719.GA27661@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i did it again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 08:43:46 -0000 On 2005-04-01 23:46, Gert Cuykens wrote: >On Apr 1, 2005 11:57 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> On 2005-04-01 03:46, Gert Cuykens wrote: >> > so termcap is like a x server but then for terminals ? >> >> Not really. The termcap(5) manpage describes this in (hopefully) >> adequate detail: >> >> % The termcap file is a data base describing terminals, used, for >> % example, by vi(1) and ncurses(3). Terminals are described in >> % termcap by giving a set of capabilities that they have and by >> % describing how operations are performed. Padding requirements >> % and initialization sequences are included in termcap. > > isnt that the same as xserver does for xclients telling the clients > what they can and cant do ? In some ways yes, in other ways no. The X servers do a better job of abstracting away some hardware features than termcap.