From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Thu Mar 30 22:18:12 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C59ED25D7C; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:18:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB97DD5; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:18:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 5FFD74297; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:18:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:18:11 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Matthew Rezny Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r437215 - in head/graphics: gbm libEGL libGL libglapi Message-ID: <20170330221811.GA82143@FreeBSD.org> References: <201703291657.v2TGvrpM076369@repo.freebsd.org> <5ecdf3a33e5b6ea0d4341aed906e3800@freebsd.org> <20170330192313.GA23522@FreeBSD.org> <2248499.et5buujvh1@workstation.reztek> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2248499.et5buujvh1@workstation.reztek> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:18:12 -0000 On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:38:22PM +0200, Matthew Rezny wrote: > While I've got your attention, could I trouble you to check out PR 217341 > and commit it before the quarterly branch if it looks good? Will do; there are few PRs that I need to address ASAP and that's one of them, thanks for reminding. > Also, is nvidia-driver something that you want to maintain, or should > x11@ take up maintainership? I'm always considering it, but every time someone tries to update it they will forget to take legacy ports into account, or do not bother to get those OSVERSIONS checks accurate enough, or something else. I'll happily let it go under x11@ wing after I can see that enough meta-knowledge is being preserved among its regular committers, if that's OK with you. ./danfe