From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 3 07:11:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E610C106566C; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 07:11:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C594B8FC0C; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 07:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p737BNMp011774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 00:11:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p737BNn7011773; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 00:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA11429; Wed, 3 Aug 11 00:04:08 PDT Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:04:11 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: bapt@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4e39555b.aXrOnSmaaWrsvmPB%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <6483ddd2504ceeb023f1e4774b495f72@etoilebsd.net> <4e390eaf.5MJ3G9ielo7JZhvs%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <9807aab2a5e2effdaa359cc38f926a8b@etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <9807aab2a5e2effdaa359cc38f926a8b@etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Deprecation: round3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:11:25 -0000 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 02:02:39 -0700, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > What, exactly, is the significance of the list at > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/distilator/ports@FreeBSD.org-bad.html > > beyond that the ports listed there are unmaintained? > > > > "make fetch" succeeded for every one of the ~150 ports that > > I tried from that list ... > > Each ports defines a list of mirrors where the distfile should > hosted, and the infrastructure append some FreeBSD mirror for > convenience. > > the list represent the number of problematic mirrors. > > It doen't mean the ports is not fetchable yet, it mean some of > its mirrors do not share the distfile anymore. Any thought of adding that explanation to ~ehaupt/distilator and/or to ~ehaupt/distilator/ports@FreeBSD.org-bad.html (or making it more prominent, if it is already there)? All I could figure out was that the list had something to do with unfetchable distfiles, thus my confusion when "make fetch" succeeded.