From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov 14 01:33:23 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA3D16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 14 Nov 2004 01:33:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from 168.18.broadband2.iol.cz (27.240.broadband2.iol.cz
	[83.208.240.27])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7B343D46
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 14 Nov 2004 01:33:22 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from bln@deprese.net)
Received: from [172.16.2.2] (helo=[172.16.2.2])
	by 168.18.broadband2.iol.cz with asmtp (Exim 4.41)
	id 1CT9Gb-0007qt-1t
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 02:33:21 +0100
Message-ID: <4196B5E0.8030709@deprese.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 02:33:20 +0100
From: Ondra Holecek <bln@deprese.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041014)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <41938544.9010109@veldy.net> <opsha4klle8527sy@smtp.local>
	<200411120050.18159.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <200411120050.18159.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: ULE Scheduler available in 5.3-RELEASE?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 01:33:23 -0000

Can you describe advantages of using SCHED_ULE on UP? or just link or 
something.


Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Thursday, 11. November 2004 16:42, Ronald Klop wrote:
> 
>>On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:29:08 -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse <veldy@veldy.net>
>>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>I just read in the release notes that 5.3-RELEASE has the new ULE
>>>scheduler available, but that 4BSD is the default scheduler.  I thought
>>>I read messages in freebsd-current indicating that the option to use ULE
>>>was completely removed from the 5.3 or even the RELENG_5 branch?  So, is
>>>ULE really available?
>>
>>Not in RELENG_5 and not in RELENG_5_3. There are issues with it. If it is
>>fixed it will come back.
>>
>>See this line in /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c:
>>#error "The SCHED_ULE scheduler is broken.  Please use SCHED_4BSD"
> 
> 
> ... which of course you can just patch out. :) I'm still using ULE on my (UP) 
> machine, works fine for me.
>