From owner-freebsd-desktop@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 14:15:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22EA106566C; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:15:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from villa.alberto@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408748FC0A; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so2774189bkc.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:15:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=u/XjMY70IkeBpDhvC86Q3aNUSq5iQAaRxC213Snh01E=; b=H1zS8qemv0XHZgLfn++SfWqxxDi7ypVLr+NAO4jZVo56mQCeTCtvlFYqbHj14EVTXo pxYoF9ZJ+HP10+S8Q2HVCczdjgKvE0tYaNvN2USbXC6pWc9euJW//nckk+5u1xDNa1Dw Qi26xnf5bPnYHL2CuhvYuSHjrOcw+/OR/UHmk= Received: by 10.204.157.148 with SMTP id b20mr7753607bkx.89.1330438528319; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:15:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from woodstock.peanuts (wifinat-16.polito.it. [130.192.232.16]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x11sm31533133bkd.2.2012.02.28.06.15.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:15:27 -0800 (PST) Sender: Alberto Villa From: Alberto Villa Organization: The FreeBSD Project To: Mel Flynn Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:15:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/10.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <20120120065141.GM4729@azathoth.lan> <201202281314.13503.avilla@freebsd.org> <4F4CDD40.1030906@acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: <4F4CDD40.1030906@acsalaska.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart29567000.lC0tlcLfLe"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202281515.26594.avilla@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What about improving the desktop ports consistency: task 1, the fonts X-BeenThere: freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Using and improving FreeBSD on the desktop List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:15:30 -0000 --nextPart29567000.lC0tlcLfLe Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 28 February 2012 14:57:20 Mel Flynn wrote: > So the unexec is executed before the font is removed? The unexec=20 makes > sense if executed after the .ttf is removed. I think it's executed *after* fonts removal. > The cache should be updated > then and if a directory tree is used by multiple ports this should > effectively remove only the uninstalled font from the cache, while > preserving the other fonts. So the unexec should be there for this case: >=20 > ./TTF/myport.ttf > ./TTF/otherport/otherport.ttf I've tried running `fc-cache -sv` on an empty font directory, but the cache= =20 wasn't updated (grepping /var/db/fontconfig for the file name returned a=20 result, and running `fc-cache -v` with no directories removed that matching= =20 cache file), so I fail to see any effect of this invocation. About all other things, I'm writing a patch for bsd.xorg.mk which I'll show= =20 you later. =2D-=20 Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla The great nations have always acted like gangsters and the small nations like prostitutes. -- Stanley Kubrick --nextPart29567000.lC0tlcLfLe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iJwEAAECAAYFAk9M4X4ACgkQ3xiC6kQ1CovUAwQAifyKs97C6DlS8jLcLhCImi2A viOodESpoO4D9Fpxyk/K9nn50hu/kEItazcyhiLS3vjBTW8YRooaxi0brX+i0ydM 3GgTTzRVdMOc/7i5C0qngN5xpbo7urkzM5vPtMZEW1lHHkSGFzXGZkjJ9kT5scju GaF9FgQHO3znW0QUnuw= =L7vj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart29567000.lC0tlcLfLe--