From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jul 22 17:20:30 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail2.uniserve.com (mail2.uniserve.com [204.244.156.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340BA37B401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 17:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tom@uniserve.com)
Received: from mail2.uniserve.com ([204.244.156.10])
	by mail2.uniserve.com with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
	id 15OTSI-0001O4-00; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 17:20:14 -0700
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 17:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com>
X-Sender: tom@athena.uniserve.ca
To: Chris Elsworth <chris@shagged.org>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ipfw, pipes, and weighting
In-Reply-To: <20010722160849.A67008@shagged.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10107221711470.4917-100000@athena.uniserve.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-stable.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-stable>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-stable>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Chris Elsworth wrote:

...
> What doesn't work is the weighting itself. I saw absolutely no difference 
> whether I had those rules in or not.

  What kind of network interface are you using?  The way that you seem to
be configuring dummynet, is as custom priority queuing system.  That is
only effective, if there are packets in the queue to sort by your
priorities.  That will be most effective if you do that on the slowest
interface in the path.


Tom


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message