From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 23:56:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CB616A4CE for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:56:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.ts.co.nz (sage.tasman.net [202.49.92.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701C843D3F for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:56:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcos@ThePacific.Net) Received: from sage.ts.co.nz ([172.16.21.1]) by sage.ts.co.nz (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9HNuned000657 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:56:52 +1300 Received: from [172.16.20.10] (gateway-nelson.thepacific.net [202.49.95.33]) by sage.ts.co.nz (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9HNr8Ht032081; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:53:08 +1300 Message-ID: <41730551.6090801@ThePacific.Net> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:50:41 +1300 From: "Marcos Biscaysaqu - ThePacific.net" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040910) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Langworth , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20041017233049.GB4336@atlantis.ccs.neu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20041017233049.GB4336@atlantis.ccs.neu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: wicontrol man page X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:56:55 -0000 wicontrol -i iface -L list all the AP available, and wicontrol -i iface -l will gi've you the stations connected. Ian Langworth wrote: >Looking at the `wicontrol' man page, it seems that the described >functionality of two options is reversed: > > wicontrol [-i] iface -l (dump associated stations) > wicontrol [-i] iface -L (list available access points) > >It seems that -l actually lists any available access points and >-L actually lists the access point that I'm associated with. > >Can anyone else confirm this? > > >