From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon May 12 19:12:04 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA21319
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 May 1997 19:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA21303
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 May 1997 19:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.5/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id CAA17001; Tue, 13 May 1997 02:11:03 GMT
Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 11:11:03 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: if_de.c ????
In-Reply-To: <199705130203.LAA12329@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970513110925.16734D-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 13 May 1997, Michael Smith wrote:

> > I didn't know SMC was having problems.  I think 3COM and Intel pushing for
> > integrated ethernet on the motherboard is more of threat to SMC than the
> > clone makers.
> 
> *laugh*  First thing I'd do with a motherboard with a 3com chip on it is
> put a decent ethernet card in it 8)

I used to think the same way, but the recent 3COM stuff seems to be pretty
good.

Mike