Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Mar 2020 21:13:48 +0100 (CET)
From:      Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To:        John Hixson <jhixson@freebsd.org>, Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,  svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r528808 - head/net/nsq
Message-ID:  <alpine.LSU.2.21.2003212108190.4184@anthias.pfeifer.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200321172227.zn7i4ov6vkvtboii@aching.in.mat.cc>
References:  <202003202245.02KMjo5Z005946@repo.freebsd.org> <20200321172227.zn7i4ov6vkvtboii@aching.in.mat.cc>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> +PORTREVISION=	2
> Why bump PORTREVISION?

John, as a bit more color: when a commit solely allows a port to build 
that failed to build before, or build where it did not build before (OS 
version, architecture,...) we don't usually bump PORTREVISION.

When we bump, we tend to start with 1. ;-)

Gerald



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LSU.2.21.2003212108190.4184>