From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug  6 15:16:46 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC9016A420
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  6 Aug 2007 15:16:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net)
Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com
	(vjofn-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net
	[IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::5e5])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3526213C45B
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  6 Aug 2007 15:16:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net)
Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com
	(cpe-68-175-8-11.hvc.res.rr.com [68.175.8.11]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
	l76FGjho075706 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:16:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com
	(localhost.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [127.0.0.1])
	by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id
	l76FGeYM063900 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:16:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net)
Received: (from tbohml@localhost)
	by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id
	l76FGefQ063899
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:16:40 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from tbohml)
From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <ml@t-b-o-h.net>
Message-Id: <200708061516.l76FGefQ063899@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:16:40 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <20070806070640.7F02.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Re[2]: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 15:16:46 -0000

> 
> On August 06, 2007 at 02:55AM Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> 
> 
> [snip}
> 
> > 	Ok. But I part of my question to people , and reason for posting it
> > here, is the old "Is anyone else seeing this". When/if you use portupgrade, does
> > it do the same for you? Or is it just something that I happened some how to inherit
> > on atleast 2 of my machines?
> 
> I have noticed the same behavior. I have some 815 ports installed;
> however, I had not noticed any significant deterioration in
> performance.
> 
	Ok, so someone else is seeing it... 

	Its not "performance" I'm worried about though. For the laptop, its
just sitting and watching it go through 915 files for an update to a small
program that doesn't rely on anything but perl.

	For my Soekris, it IS bothersome. CF cards have a limited life, and
all those rewrites decrease it.

	So I guess its the new way it does it then.

			Tuc