From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Apr 29 19:38:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA11408 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 29 Apr 1998 19:38:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA11382 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 1998 19:38:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doconnor@cain.gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA13249; Thu, 30 Apr 1998 12:08:09 +0930 (CST) Message-Id: <199804300238.MAA13249@cain.gsoft.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: John-Mark Gurney cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: reducing checksum check... In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Apr 1998 18:16:32 MST." <19980429181632.42978@hydrogen.nike.efn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 12:08:09 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > checksum a package, even when your not going to use the source package > durning the build... Yes.. This can be a pain when you are testing ports over NFS and they are large.. (Netscape comes to mind :) > if people think this change should go in, I'm willing to create/commit > the patch... Sounds OK to me if you are willing.. --------------------------------------------------------------------- |Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software | |http://www.gsoft.com.au | |The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to| |choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message