Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 23:02:48 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jamil J. Weatherbee" <jamil@counterintelligence.ml.org> To: Jimbo Bahooli <griffin@blackhole.iceworld.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch to sshd to maintain consistency when using libwrap. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970831230149.1284A-100000@counterintelligence.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970901002120.196A-100000@blackhole.iceworld.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
One thing that I really really need is block encryption on an entire
filesystem under freebsd --- does this exist. also can I use ssh to
encrypt single files under idea.
On Mon, 1 Sep 1997, Jimbo Bahooli wrote:
> This patch to sshd only affects it when using libwrap. One would
> expect sshd to log accepted connections just as tcpd, but that is not that
> case until this patch is added. A long term solution I see is to add an
> opposite to refuse() to libwrap that will provide logging as refuse()
> does.
>
>
> --- sshd-old.c Tue Apr 22 19:40:08 1997
> +++ sshd.c Mon Sep 1 00:01:20 1997
> @@ -1020,7 +1020,14 @@
> request_init(&req, RQ_DAEMON, av0, RQ_FILE, newsock, NULL);
> fromhost(&req);
> if (!hosts_access(&req))
> - refuse(&req);
> + {
> + refuse(&req);
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + syslog(allow_severity,"connect from %s", eval_client(&req));
> + }
> +
> }
> #endif /* LIBWRAP */
>
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970831230149.1284A-100000>