From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 21:13:49 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F06316A418; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607C113C45D; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot26.obsecurity.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6481A4D7C; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot26.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A47DDC1D2; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:13:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:13:48 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Gabor Kovesdan Message-ID: <20070805211348.GA24361@rot26.obsecurity.org> References: <20070805055340.GA11899@rot26.obsecurity.org> <46B637AA.1040001@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46B637AA.1040001@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: PORTSDIR use-before-define fix X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:13:49 -0000 On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 10:48:42PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Kris Kennaway escribi?: > >Previous DESTDIR commits introduced dereferences of ${PORTSDIR} before > >it was set (via .include), which broke e.g. portmaster. This diff > >shuffles some things around to hopefully restore everything to being > >defined before it is used. It also cleans up some stale cruft. It > >has only been lightly tested. > > > > > I haven't tested it yet, but it seems good to me. Thanks for working on > this! I'll test it a bit next > day. What about COMMENTFILE? I see it was removed, but can't see it > added back. Is it > completely obsolete? Yes, for 3 years now :) Kris