From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jun 10 22:31:24 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA02237
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 22:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA02232
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 22:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.60 #1)
	id 0wbfzN-0002BM-00; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 23:30:33 -0600
To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
Subject: Re: BIND 8.1 
Cc: Michael Beckmann <beckmann@nacamar.de>, hackers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 10 Jun 1997 16:42:47 PDT."
		<Pine.BSF.3.95q.970610164124.20773B-100000@misery.sdf.com> 
References: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970610164124.20773B-100000@misery.sdf.com>  
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 23:30:33 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Message-Id: <E0wbfzN-0002BM-00@rover.village.org>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970610164124.20773B-100000@misery.sdf.com> Tom Samplonius writes:
:   8.1 should be imported into current, but that isn't so trivial, but that
: is primarily a cvs problem, not a porting problem.

Likely we want to wait for 8.1.1.  Some of my friends here have
reported problems in 8.1 that impact zone transfers that have been
fixed in the private alpha/beta of 8.1.1.

Warner