From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Nov 26 17:49:42 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA15959
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 17:49:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jmb@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA15952;
          Tue, 26 Nov 1996 17:49:39 -0800 (PST)
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb>
Message-Id: <199611270149.RAA15952@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ctm-cvs-cur dealta 2716 broken
To: jhs@FreeBSD.org
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 17:49:38 -0800 (PST)
Cc: jmb@FreeBSD.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, postmaster@FreeBSD.org,
        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199611252358.AAA19765@vector.jhs.no_domain> from "Julian H. Stacey" at Nov 26, 96 00:58:31 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> 
> Hi, Reference:
> > From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb> 
> > Subject: Re: ctm-cvs-cur dealta 2716 broken 
> > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 06:24:27 -0800 (PST) 
> > Message-id: <199611251424.GAA20019@freefall.freebsd.org> 
> >
> > 	hey, wait a minute there is  a ctm-announce mailing list.
> > 	i forgot to create an info file for the list
> > 
> > done. thanks.
> 
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> Maybe you or PHK could add to the info, where follow-up discussion should
> occur ? 
> I recently followed up on current@ to an announcement on ctm-announce@,
>   ( I did this to keep ctm-announce@ a low traffic channel, but it seems
>     to have caused some confusion )
> If a standard follow up address was documented, I'd be glad to comply :-)

	well there is not a standard follow up address really.
	rather announcements about current should go to current.
	those about 2.1.x should go to stable i guess.

	there is always hackers and questions ;)

jmb