From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 9 18:07:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA06104 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 18:07:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp (afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp [131.113.212.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA05899 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 18:05:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp) Received: (from hosokawa@localhost) by afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp (8.8.8+2.7Wbeta7/3.6Wbeta6-ntc_mailserver1.03) id LAA18980; Tue, 10 Mar 1998 11:05:44 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 11:05:44 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199803100205.LAA18980@afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp> To: yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp Cc: mike@smith.net.au, walter@fortean.com, am@amsoft.ru, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp Subject: Re: APM power off (patch) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Mar 1998 10:32:57 +0900". <199803100132.KAA24025@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> From: hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp (HOSOKAWA Tatsumi) X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.20] 1996-12/08(Sun) Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <199803100132.KAA24025@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp writes: >> It means that we had better formulate a framework in which both can be >> implemented and work in a standardized manner, right? -current has already had APM power-off feature. I've also implemented it in extended at_shutdown() manner for PAO, but -current uses i386/machdep.c. I think both implementations are reasonable, so I have no plan to replace -current code with mine or something else. Sorry. -- HOSOKAWA, Tatsumi Network Technology Center Keio University hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message