Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Sep 2002 22:34:35 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To:        Sean Farley <sean-freebsd@farley.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Slow I/O responsiveness with UDMA133
Message-ID:  <20020925223241.O5757-100000@patrocles.silby.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020925215927.L384-100000@thor.farley.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Sean Farley wrote:

> With write cache enabled it does perform better, but I would like the
> new computer to at least equal the old system without it enabled.

With all due respect, whether that's a reality isn't your choice, it's the
drive's choice. :)

Does the drive support tagged queueing?  That should give you the benefits
of write caching with a little bit more safety.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020925223241.O5757-100000>