From owner-freebsd-newbies Fri Oct 29 11:53: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Received: from edtnps04.telusplanet.net (edtnps04.telusplanet.net [198.161.157.104]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACBF14CB8 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swheeler@altech.ab.ca) Received: from ftmmpx04-port-29.agt.net ([161.184.224.237]:3279 "HELO shannon-s") by smtp1.telusplanet.net with SMTP id ; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 12:52:30 -0600 Message-ID: <030701bf223f$3a921740$0307070a@shannon-s> From: "Shannon Wheeler" To: Subject: Re: routing, win95, etc Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 12:49:59 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Yeah, I figured it was more of a Win95 question but I also figured I would be liklier to find a higher level of expertise here than in most WinXX groups. I also figured there are quite likely some unix experts who also know a thing or two about WinXX networking. Assume the FreeBSD box was the dual-homed unit. What would be the route command to enable the routing from the isolated 10.7.1 network to the main 10.7.7 net? Are you saying that as it is, something has to be done on the BSD box to make the directly reachable interface the default router? Or does that have to be done on the Win95 box as well? thanks again, that's (probably) the last I'll ask about it here. Shannon -----Original Message----- From: David Wolfskill Date: October 29, 1999 12:11 PM >>From: "Shannon Wheeler" >>Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 11:42:33 -0600 > >>What I don't get is how to make the BSD box see through the Win95 box to the >>rest of the network. I've played alot with 'route add' but haven't found a >>combination that works. I am able to ping 10.7.7.3 from the BSD box but not >>past there to 10.7.7.x. > >>I don't know if I'm unable to do it just because I apparently don't >>understand the route command(s) (I thought I did before I ever needed to use >>it ;-) ) or is my major mistake a little further up with the IP address >>assignments? Should this additional network be on 10.7.7? > >The dual-homed box would thus be a router; in addition to making its >directly-reachable interface the default router for the FreeBSD box, you >would also need to tell the dual-homed box to route packets between the >interfaces. I have no clue how to do that except with a stand-alone >router or with a UNIX box, so I can't really help you there.... > >It's *possible* that others in the FreeBSD community (in >freebsd-questions, for example) may be able to help, but it's not a >FreeBSD issue -- it's a Win95 issue (as far as I can tell). > >Were you using the FreeBSD box as the router, that would be fairly >straightforward (and a matter for -questions, if the material at >http://www.freebsd.org/ didn't address the mater adequately). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message