From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 00:12:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9496016A4B3 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6AD43FA3 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:12:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9G7D1wt050277; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:13:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id h9G7D1as050276; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:13:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:13:01 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20031016071301.GQ88224@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20031015133634.GA37556@nagual.pp.ru> <43618.1066226536@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="I4VOKWutKNZEOIPu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43618.1066226536@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! cc: Andrey Chernov cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org cc: Wilko Bulte Subject: Re: hiding e-mail adresses needed badly X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 07:12:41 -0000 --I4VOKWutKNZEOIPu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [imho this belongs on -chat] On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 04:02:16PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > And I personally think that by "hiding" the email addresses, you concede > defeat to the spammers. I don't want to let a bunch of low-life > con-men decide how I can and should use the InterNet. Hear hear, I wish more people would take this POV. Hiding your email address is a constant process that you can never stop doing; and once you've made o= ne mistake the spammers get you anyway. Better to implement filters and never = see them. And if they still get through, just hit 'd' (the spam I get is identifiable by subject 99% of the time), and move on... --Stijn --=20 "I used to think I was indecisive, but now I'm not so sure." --I4VOKWutKNZEOIPu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/jkT9Y3r/tLQmfWcRApEdAJ9H3+os67WCsOBn/U5h6bXNMc59nACfUk0l S5ctYgrDzIx/AFfmOWAooZk= =ERPE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --I4VOKWutKNZEOIPu--