From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Jan  7 15:53:01 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id PAA00721 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 7 Jan 1995 15:53:01 -0800
Received: from bsd.coe.montana.edu (bsd.coe.montana.edu [153.90.192.4]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA00715 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 7 Jan 1995 15:52:59 -0800
Received: (nate@localhost) by bsd.coe.montana.edu (8.6.8/8.3) id QAA17953; Sat, 7 Jan 1995 16:57:05 -0700
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 1995 16:57:05 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu>
Message-Id: <199501072357.QAA17953@bsd.coe.montana.edu>
In-Reply-To: John Beukema <jbeukema@HK.Super.NET>
       "Re: SLIP problems" (Jan  8,  7:50am)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: John Beukema <jbeukema@HK.Super.NET>
Subject: Re: SLIP problems
Cc: Eric Blood <eblood@winky.reno.nv.us>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> I have the same problem.

Does that mean you have a flow-control problem, or what?  Also, this kind
of problem happened to me when I was using compressed SLIP and my provider
wasn't.  Small packets made it through but the bigger packets didn't.

Weird.


Nate