From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 11 10:31:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99903C98 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potato.growveg.org (potato.growveg.org [62.49.247.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57FD911D1 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from john by potato.growveg.org with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1WDAcm-0007hp-1U for freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:31:32 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:31:31 +0000 From: John To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: release or stable, for wifi Message-ID: <20140211103131.GA27302@potato.growveg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: John X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john@potato.growveg.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on potato.growveg.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:31:35 -0000 Hello list, Is it better (for wireless) to follow 10-R, 10-STABLE or 11? The situation is an acer aspire v5 netbook. I'm running new xorg because it's an amd c70 with a radeon chipset. Thing is, it needs some kind of reliability. Wireless is provided by the ath0 driver. thanks, -- John