From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 23:40:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A90316A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:40:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B57B43D31 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:40:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roop.nanuwa@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w29so8172356cwb for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.118.39 with SMTP id q39mr74057cwc; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <75f3f70504071116405845fc32@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:40:03 -0700 From: Roop Nanuwa To: Vulpes Velox In-Reply-To: <20040711174256.2046a84b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1089277280.236.12.camel@Desolation> <20040708232618.531e6fd7@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <200407091324.16445.kirk@strauser.com> <20040711175514.GA21000@lori.mine.nu> <20040711174256.2046a84b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> cc: Geert Hendrickx cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:40:07 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:42:56 -0500, Vulpes Velox wrote: > LOL, really fewer features than Windows 98 GDI? Did Windows 98 > recently become network extensible and no one has told me? After a > quick look at what Windows 98's GDI does, I really do not see how > XFree86 fails to measure up to it. > Exactly, you're comparing it to Win98 and saying "Yeah, we can do that too!" Problem is the rest of the world (OS X, Windows > 98) have moved on in what end-user features they provide. Network extensibility is a valid point but I was referring to things like window compositing and other eye candy features. --roop