Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 May 2012 00:03:26 +0200
From:      Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>, James <james@hicag.org>,  FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Possible Clang regression - object files are always mode 0600
Message-ID:  <4FC547AE.9060606@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FC50065.3030201@andric.com>
References:  <CAD4099=POFm_bpBGjLXozFF9MX1SrAc-UCR8SwRnh7LVf=FdoQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120529162701.GZ1509@albert.catwhisker.org> <4FC50065.3030201@andric.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-05-29 18:59, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-05-29 18:27, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:39:19AM -0500, James wrote:
>>> Hi all. I've come across a possible Clang regression that recently
>>> crept into stable/9. I'd like to check to see whether it's a true bug
>>> or if I jacked something up. It appears all object files are created
>>> with mode 0600 rather than honoring umask.
> Just so you know, this is indeed a regression that has crept into clang,
> and even into the 3.1 release. :(
> 
> I'm working on fixing it in head, then I will merge the fix to stable/9
> in a few days.

Fixed in head in r236260; the merge will follow soon.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC547AE.9060606>