From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Feb 11 23:12:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A1FAA5506 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C67D230 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:12:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E90128D1 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:07:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:07:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobik.me; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=6EgM6XlRmv5ElpR7WaU5W/PoEjQ=; b=W0KL5m BhFJDCzeqFYR7kOdueXSBbAP6DRw2G0C0LcRuVgzrA/1etk0/VzdT95O8lMA2b3k Gxs8R7uD/w5AErZY7NmdSC+fxmVQ7SKcvsae9MYHO109o3pH5bP39PO1IVjjdDH6 01tP/2VTrYda7wCW1xM07zsUE8PN16RvloSEo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=6EgM6XlRmv5ElpR 7WaU5W/PoEjQ=; b=pOXnPnDowbEy1TV54YE8bbKaW6Xfg0nk4B5cI23CyilD3zm B5OrDzzuRRfi0VKXj9uHQm6bip/HogtC6+teTkmPHGlPbmX5J5Vpl3S/NzazVBFR GmyM/x1dSxR1qx76Bk8CpyDpWE7pVkrjO94pGous1zrPxX87uJq7iTUFNmA4= Received: by web6.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1BCD14D8B9; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:07:21 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1455232041.461060.518893674.5947DE04@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: XCQcHsP/UNTow7+Gf4hwtPi5jsxOgPVB9qn/fdF2i7nJ 1455232041 From: Tobias Kortkamp To: Yuri , FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-e69f0414 In-Reply-To: <56BD0DC0.10401@rawbw.com> References: <56BD0DC0.10401@rawbw.com> Subject: Re: Firefox has rough, non-antialised fonts. Anybody knows how to correct? Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:07:21 +0100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:12:58 -0000 Bitmap fonts are enabled by default. You can disable them globally by running ln -s /usr/local/etc/fonts/conf.avail/70-no-bitmaps.conf /usr/local/etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf Chromium seems to do its own thing regarding font rendering. On Thu, Feb 11, 2016, at 11:40 PM, Yuri wrote: > For some reason firefox-42.0 has non-antialiased fonts, at least some of > them, and this makes it look poor. Comparing to chrome where fonts look > much better. > > I also heard complaints from some other FreeBSD users that fonts > generally look noticeably worse than in Arch out of the box, though I > didn't notice this myself. > > Anybody knows what is the reason of this Firefox font issue? > > Yuri > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"