From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Fri Apr 15 19:12:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8590DAED4C2; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A36811AE; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ar9A5-000IkI-Lc; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 21:12:13 +0200 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 21:12:13 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Mathieu Arnold , Kurt Jaeger , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r413353 - head/www/rt44 Message-ID: <20160415191213.GC87626@fc.opsec.eu> References: <201604151630.u3FGU931096634@repo.freebsd.org> <20160415170119.GB60195@FreeBSD.org> <3BF5E874B555664E9A706063@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20160415190801.GA21600@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160415190801.GA21600@FreeBSD.org> X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:12:18 -0000 Hi! > > | Wrong: PR 208229 was not submitted by matthew@. > > > > Submitted by has nothing to do with who submitted the PR, it's about who > > submitted the patch. > > Both lines together create needless confusion that could be easily avoided > if Kurt would've simply omitted PR reference 'cause it has nothing related > to this particular commit. It is related, see https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2016-April/122392.html In that commit matthew (who maintains rt40 and rt42, thanks to him for that!) noted that CONFLICTS in those ports had the wrong value and fixed it for his ports, as he saw what I did with rt44 (where I missed this!). So it's his submission to the rt44 PR, which caused me to attribute it to him. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !