From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 1 20:16:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1750516A41F; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 20:16:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mv.twc.weather.com (mv.twc.weather.com [65.212.71.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523E043D46; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 20:16:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.50.40.201] (Not Verified[65.202.103.25]) by mv.twc.weather.com with NetIQ MailMarshal (v6, 0, 3, 8) id ; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 16:31:31 -0400 From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:22:25 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050728.091810.85228740.imp@bsdimp.com> <20050729.000202.74568315.imp@bsdimp.com> <05072914090418.26779@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <05072914090418.26779@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508011522.27593.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: vova@fbsd.ru, Tai-hwa Liang , current@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: owi build broken in recent 7-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:16:58 -0000 On Friday 29 July 2005 02:13 am, Tai-hwa Liang wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: <05072911422415.24212@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw> > > > > Tai-hwa Liang writes: > > : I'm wondering about whether the "old wi ad-hoc" and AHDEMO in if_wi > > : are the same... > > > > They are. > > Hmm... Vladimir, would you please also try to patch your if_wi with: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~avatar/if_wi.c.patch > > and see whether it fixes the wi adhoc issue for you? FYI, the patch seems to lose setting of the WEP capability from an initial glance. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org