From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 11:43:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D5116A4E2 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:43:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4869C43D4C for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:43:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so592776nfc for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 04:43:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=n3CNrB3k3dwNOi1KWkglPdqKUvTPPF2Ry3NaU+X6MA1UWCesvOeu8ihn63SIgO4gMwqhoXA8c0qtJA95z04KGy+OpFF+1GY+OirrNIdKVZIg3on2rWCF5ROo+uXXdKzJFKv4oaFBPU7Yn9IdMzrBfUZJE/yud/gqY5Z4QEz0fY0= Received: by 10.49.29.3 with SMTP id g3mr3404870nfj; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 04:43:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?131.155.69.164? ( [131.155.69.164]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id l32sm3586913nfa.2006.08.24.04.43.22; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 04:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44ED90D6.5080303@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:43:18 +0200 From: Rene Ladan User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: inconsistency in portmaster's stale distfile handling X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:43:29 -0000 Hi, I decided to give portmaster a try to get rid of ${PORTSDIR}/INDEX*db and /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db. It works quite nice, but IMO there is a inconsistency in the -d option: after vim got updated from 7.0.x to 7.0.66, portmaster -a -d deleted vim/vim-6.4.tar.bz2 (which is still an up-to-date distfile for vim6, but older than vim/vim-7.0.tar.bz2), but not vim/6.4.* I don't have vim6 installed, so the -d option should either not delete vim-6.4.tar.bz2 or remove all of vim6's distfiles, including vim/6.4.* If someone has both vim6 and vim7 installed, would portmaster -d also delete vim-6.4.tar.bz2 ? Regards, Rene -- GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) "It won't fit on the line." -- me, 2001