From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 6 04:24:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632F716A420 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 04:24:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30BC43D45 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 04:24:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x29so818698nfb for ; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 20:24:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=HzfrzqmOYV1ck86HcFkv0fIjeFoYAm2SdKgqivMx6Mc94o1/59LQ92XYJPruup4xqsD8+MdW/BXf3hUisomYR7v9cVqzvYezTiiaFSkI73jJ8/nYI8RD3jG2PXvYsga4pdnbQxpEjdX+R2ueYptqWLq/EO0c9vY7L98OgLvHblg= Received: by 10.48.142.9 with SMTP id p9mr2229586nfd; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 20:24:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.211.5 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Mar 2006 20:24:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 23:24:08 -0500 From: "Xn Nooby" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Is there a "stable" ports tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 04:24:10 -0000 Is there a "stable" ports tree? I think I read somewhere that RELEASE/STABLE/SECURITY/CURRENT is for the "core" OS, and that the "ports" tree is always "CURRENT". Is this true? I would like to be able to update my ports with the best chance of not hitting any snags, so I was curious. thx!