From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 27 10:00:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB1E16A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:00:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3697743D2D for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:00:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBRA0jU9022392 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:00:45 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBRA0j7g022391; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:00:45 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:00:45 GMT Message-Id: <200412271000.iBRA0j7g022391@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Jilles Tjoelker Subject: Re: ports/75147: [PATCH] Several improvements to security/putty, mainly pterm X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jilles Tjoelker List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:00:46 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/75147; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jilles Tjoelker To: Volker Stolz Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/75147: [PATCH] Several improvements to security/putty, mainly pterm Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:03:26 +0100 On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:44:02PM +0000, Volker Stolz wrote: > Synopsis: [PATCH] Several improvements to security/putty, mainly pterm > Did you consider reporting this to the upstream author? > I'm a bit wary of committing extensive patches that I don't > understand :) > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=75147 I got more positive results from the upstream author than I expected. It will probably not be necessary to commit this (but it may be if they do not want to include it later). -- Jilles Tjoelker