From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 15 17:31:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99A037B401 for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 17:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.urchin.com (ns2.quantified.com [63.212.171.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2056843FAF for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 17:31:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Received: from support.urchin.com (support.urchin.com [63.212.171.7]) by mail.urchin.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4G0Vn3g025029; Thu, 15 May 2003 17:31:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Received: from danzig.sd.quantified.net (web.urchin.com [63.212.171.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by support.urchin.com (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4G0WQxU040970; Thu, 15 May 2003 17:32:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) From: Doug Silver Organization: Urchin Software Corporation To: "Brandon S. Allbery " KF8NH , Wes Peters Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 17:31:41 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200305151602.20378.wes@softweyr.com> <1053039904.76608.2.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net> In-Reply-To: <1053039904.76608.2.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305151731.19124.dsilver@urchin.com> X-Filter-Version: 1.7 (mail.urchin.com) cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl version in -STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 00:31:43 -0000 On Thursday 15 May 2003 04:04 pm, Brandon S. Allbery wrote: > On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 19:02, Wes Peters wrote: > > Has anyone run a recent -STABLE with Perl 5.6.1 in place of the system > > Perl? I'm doing something like this at work in the near future, so I'm > > interested in the outcome if it has already happened and completely > > willing to share my results if it hasn't already been done. > > I've been doing that (and more recently 5.8.0) via "use.perl port" on > -STABLE for a while now; no problems. I've also been able to remove the /usr/bin/perl stuff, *but* I was not able to build one of the ports, because it had the requirement of perl 5.00x and refused to build with perl5.6x. Of course, now I can't remember the details so perhaps it is possible to bypass these problems. I think setting the PERL_VERSION in /etc/make.conf is what broke it, but I could be wrong. -doug