From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jul 7 1:40: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876B114C99 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 01:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id BAA03822; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 01:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 01:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199907070840.BAA03822@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: David Greenman Subject: Re: kern/12543: [PATCH] cumulative error stats for fxp(4) Reply-To: David Greenman Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/12543; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Greenman To: Craig Leres Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/12543: [PATCH] cumulative error stats for fxp(4) Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 01:38:05 -0700 >>Description: > > It would be really sweet if one could look at the long term > error counters for the intel 10/100 card. This information > can be invaluable in debugging network problems. > >>How-To-Repeat: > > The fxp driver only keeps around the last set of incremental > changes to the error counters. > >>Fix: > > Add a new fxp_stats struct and add in new amounts fxp_stats_update(). Hello, Craig. I actually had counters like that in an early version of the driver but decided to remove them for performance reasons. I wonder if these should be hidden behind a compile time option? -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message