From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Thu Jul 4 12:20:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25E615D45A5; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 12:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48B778FB88; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 12:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 2197B1864A; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 12:20:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Mark Linimon Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r505827 - in head: Mk www/firefox References: <201907041139.x64BdntW073318@repo.freebsd.org> <20190704120153.GB17666@lonesome.com> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 14:20:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190704120153.GB17666@lonesome.com> (Mark Linimon's message of "Thu, 4 Jul 2019 12:01:53 +0000") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48B778FB88 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.95 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.995,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.956,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:96.47.64.0/20, country:US] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:20:09 -0000 Mark Linimon writes: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 11:39:49AM +0000, Jan Beich wrote: > >> Log: >> gecko: drop GTK2 and RUST options after r505740 and r505753 > > This tells me "what" but not "why". I don't track these developments > enough to even understand the "why", even after looking at the above > two revisions. The implicit reason for (any?) removals is "unused". Those commits reference the last consumers.