Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:48:35 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris BeHanna <behanna@zbzoom.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Stable <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RAID5 Message-ID: <20010904104835.B10292@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20010903142613.O10812-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org>; from behanna@zbzoom.net on Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 02:27:13PM -0400 References: <031a01c1349f$6a4cb160$2aa8a8c0@melim.com.br> <20010903142613.O10812-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, 3 September 2001 at 14:27:13 -0400, Chris BeHanna wrote: > On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Ronan Lucio wrote: > >> Hi Friends, >> >> Thanks a lot for your answers. >> >> Once more to confirm: >> So, If I have 3 HDs with 36 Gb each, I will have 72 Gb of >> avaliable space and I one of them breake, the computer will >> continues working in another one until I have replace it? Ok? > > Yes, but write performance will be absolutely horrible until you > replace the broken drive and rebuild the volume. No, this is not correct. Write performance is better when one drive is down. Reliability isn't :-) Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010904104835.B10292>